<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Younger voters favor gay marriage. So?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/12/28/younger-voters-favor-gay-marriage-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/12/28/younger-voters-favor-gay-marriage-so/</link>
	<description>A website for LGBT folks who support marriage as the union of husband and wife—and getting the gay leadership to return to more pressing LGBT issues for our community.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chairm</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/12/28/younger-voters-favor-gay-marriage-so/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>Chairm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=106#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>The sample of black respondents in the Field study is very low (less than 60) and the margin of error correspondingly high.

The exit poll had much larger samples and lower margin of error. That ought to be taken into account when deciding whether or not to peg the exit poll as an outlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sample of black respondents in the Field study is very low (less than 60) and the margin of error correspondingly high.</p>
<p>The exit poll had much larger samples and lower margin of error. That ought to be taken into account when deciding whether or not to peg the exit poll as an outlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/12/28/younger-voters-favor-gay-marriage-so/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=106#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>"Even if that Field Study is flawless, it only refers to California, which is far from a “typical” state."

Sure, but in fact it's the trend across the board: the majority of the net change is generational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even if that Field Study is flawless, it only refers to California, which is far from a “typical” state.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, but in fact it&#8217;s the trend across the board: the majority of the net change is generational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Benkof</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/12/28/younger-voters-favor-gay-marriage-so/#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>David Benkof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=106#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>Even if that Field Study is flawless, it only refers to California, which is far from a "typical" state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if that Field Study is flawless, it only refers to California, which is far from a &#8220;typical&#8221; state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/12/28/younger-voters-favor-gay-marriage-so/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=106#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>DB: "I’m not asserting that the younger-voters statistic is age-oriented rather than generational; I’m just raising the possibility that it might be."

It's a possibility to be considered, but in fact we already know it doesn't pan out, see e.g., http://www.field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/Rls2223.pdf .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DB: &#8220;I’m not asserting that the younger-voters statistic is age-oriented rather than generational; I’m just raising the possibility that it might be.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a possibility to be considered, but in fact we already know it doesn&#8217;t pan out, see e.g., <a href="http://www.field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/Rls2223.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/Rls2223.pdf</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
