<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From a &#8220;queer traditional marriage activist&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/07/10/from-a-queer-traditional-marriage-activist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/07/10/from-a-queer-traditional-marriage-activist/</link>
	<description>A website for LGBT folks who support marriage as the union of husband and wifeâ€”and getting the gay leadership to return to more pressing LGBT issues for our community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/07/10/from-a-queer-traditional-marriage-activist/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=98#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>interesting tidbit from cyberspace. . .â€œNobody asked me to leave [the company] because of my column,â€ Bianco said in an interview at that time. â€œBut the fact that I no longer consider myself gay meant I was uncomfortable having gay journalism be my lifeâ€™s work. â€œI believe that within a couple years Iâ€™m probably going to be married with a growing family, God willing,â€ he said. In another recent â€œOver the Rainbowâ€ column, Bianco denounced gays and lesbians who have babies, calling them â€œselfishâ€ for purposefully depriving offspring of a mother or father.   in an interview with Rex Wockner back in 2003.  

David you continue:    If I come to the conclusion that itâ€™s (the no-sex with men) oppressive and doesnâ€™t work for me and leads to misery, Iâ€™m a smart, free individual, and I can make a different decision... Iâ€™m retaining the right to change my mind later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting tidbit from cyberspace. . .â€œNobody asked me to leave [the company] because of my column,â€ Bianco said in an interview at that time. â€œBut the fact that I no longer consider myself gay meant I was uncomfortable having gay journalism be my lifeâ€™s work. â€œI believe that within a couple years Iâ€™m probably going to be married with a growing family, God willing,â€ he said. In another recent â€œOver the Rainbowâ€ column, Bianco denounced gays and lesbians who have babies, calling them â€œselfishâ€ for purposefully depriving offspring of a mother or father.   in an interview with Rex Wockner back in 2003.  </p>
<p>David you continue:    If I come to the conclusion that itâ€™s (the no-sex with men) oppressive and doesnâ€™t work for me and leads to misery, Iâ€™m a smart, free individual, and I can make a different decision&#8230; Iâ€™m retaining the right to change my mind later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew van der Spuy</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/07/10/from-a-queer-traditional-marriage-activist/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew van der Spuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=98#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, David, you are opposed to homosexual marriage because it infringes the rights of religious people. However, if you look at it from the other perspective, religious objections to gay marriage infringe the rights of gay people. I don&#039;t know what the answer is to such a dilemma. What _does_ a judiciary do when deciding between a conflict of rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, David, you are opposed to homosexual marriage because it infringes the rights of religious people. However, if you look at it from the other perspective, religious objections to gay marriage infringe the rights of gay people. I don&#8217;t know what the answer is to such a dilemma. What _does_ a judiciary do when deciding between a conflict of rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

