<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My gay marriage heroes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/</link>
	<description>A website for LGBT folks who support marriage as the union of husband and wifeâ€”and getting the gay leadership to return to more pressing LGBT issues for our community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chairm</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Chairm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=71#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>The SSM campaign has a strategy that works, at least superficially. It is called inducement of issue fatigue. 

Meanwhile the very few bright and reasonable people don&#039;t have the influence that they would need to put forth their argument above the noise. By merely appearing to be respectful of marriage defenders, such people draw the scorn of the drum bangers.

The dispute is not really about marriage, anyway, but rather it is about the innoculation of the gay kind of identity politics.

Being accused of betraying one&#039;s identity group can be far more persuasive than reasoned arguments. This is not something brand new and it is not something invented by the SSM campaign. But the din tends to drown out the voices of reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SSM campaign has a strategy that works, at least superficially. It is called inducement of issue fatigue. </p>
<p>Meanwhile the very few bright and reasonable people don&#8217;t have the influence that they would need to put forth their argument above the noise. By merely appearing to be respectful of marriage defenders, such people draw the scorn of the drum bangers.</p>
<p>The dispute is not really about marriage, anyway, but rather it is about the innoculation of the gay kind of identity politics.</p>
<p>Being accused of betraying one&#8217;s identity group can be far more persuasive than reasoned arguments. This is not something brand new and it is not something invented by the SSM campaign. But the din tends to drown out the voices of reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Benkof</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>David Benkof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=71#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Dan writes: &quot;Despite all of your protestations to the contrary, there is tangible harm associated with denying same-sex couples the actual term â€œmarriageâ€ (see the CA decision).&quot;

I&#039;ve read In Re Marriage Cases twice, and all the harm they mention appears symbolic to me, rather than tangible. If you can show me substantial, serious, tangible harms from using the term &quot;domestic partnership&quot; instead of &quot;marriage&quot; I will stop my &quot;protestations to the contrary.&quot; The best way to change my mind is with evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan writes: &#8220;Despite all of your protestations to the contrary, there is tangible harm associated with denying same-sex couples the actual term â€œmarriageâ€ (see the CA decision).&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read In Re Marriage Cases twice, and all the harm they mention appears symbolic to me, rather than tangible. If you can show me substantial, serious, tangible harms from using the term &#8220;domestic partnership&#8221; instead of &#8220;marriage&#8221; I will stop my &#8220;protestations to the contrary.&#8221; The best way to change my mind is with evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Benkof</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>David Benkof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=71#comment-919</guid>
		<description>Rusty-

I didn&#039;t make a friend cry. I made a lesbian I don&#039;t know cry several years ago. A lesbian I do know said she&#039;s no longer my friend last week. Believe it or not, I know more than one lesbian.

Timothy-

I did not mention Timothy&#039;s position on California because I do not know it. It is possible he does not know it. If you have evidence Timothy approves of suing newspapers for refusing to recognize same-sex marriages as equal, I will be shocked, but I will make that clear on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rusty-</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t make a friend cry. I made a lesbian I don&#8217;t know cry several years ago. A lesbian I do know said she&#8217;s no longer my friend last week. Believe it or not, I know more than one lesbian.</p>
<p>Timothy-</p>
<p>I did not mention Timothy&#8217;s position on California because I do not know it. It is possible he does not know it. If you have evidence Timothy approves of suing newspapers for refusing to recognize same-sex marriages as equal, I will be shocked, but I will make that clear on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=71#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Christopher was not stating that the best way to go about accomplishing equality in California was persuasion.  He was stating that the best way to accomplish some measure of equal treatment from businesses in Tennessee - where there are no non-discrimination laws - is persuasion.

Because there are no legal gay marriages in Tennessee, Chistopher would put pressure on newspapers through guilds.  

But Gee, you&#039;d never know that from reading the posting above.  

I wonder if David Benkof ever feels remorse for mischaracterizing others&#039; views in order to make it seem that they agree with him.  I wonder if it bothers him that he has to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher was not stating that the best way to go about accomplishing equality in California was persuasion.  He was stating that the best way to accomplish some measure of equal treatment from businesses in Tennessee &#8211; where there are no non-discrimination laws &#8211; is persuasion.</p>
<p>Because there are no legal gay marriages in Tennessee, Chistopher would put pressure on newspapers through guilds.  </p>
<p>But Gee, you&#8217;d never know that from reading the posting above.  </p>
<p>I wonder if David Benkof ever feels remorse for mischaracterizing others&#8217; views in order to make it seem that they agree with him.  I wonder if it bothers him that he has to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dirksen</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dirksen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=71#comment-878</guid>
		<description>The hard truth about this issue is that you can sit as many gay activists (reasonable or otherwise) down with as many traditional marriage activists (reasonable or otherwise) as many times as you want and I&#039;m certain you will not reach a compromise.  There is no compromise here.  

Marriage is binary--you either are or you aren&#039;t married.  You either let same-sex couples marry or you don&#039;t.  Compromises like civil unions and domestic partnership don&#039;t cut it, especially when marriage is available in some places.  Despite all of your protestations to the contrary, there is tangible harm associated with denying same-sex couples the actual term &quot;marriage&quot; (see the CA decision).  

Equality is also binary--either you are equal or you are not.  You cannot get around the fact that the vast majority of gay people frame this issue in these terms.  And I&#039;m quite certain that no amount of meetings will alter that framework.  This is a winner-take-all choice.  There are reasonable people on both sides of this issue.  But some of those reasonable people will not get their way, no matter how reasonable they try to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hard truth about this issue is that you can sit as many gay activists (reasonable or otherwise) down with as many traditional marriage activists (reasonable or otherwise) as many times as you want and I&#8217;m certain you will not reach a compromise.  There is no compromise here.  </p>
<p>Marriage is binary&#8211;you either are or you aren&#8217;t married.  You either let same-sex couples marry or you don&#8217;t.  Compromises like civil unions and domestic partnership don&#8217;t cut it, especially when marriage is available in some places.  Despite all of your protestations to the contrary, there is tangible harm associated with denying same-sex couples the actual term &#8220;marriage&#8221; (see the CA decision).  </p>
<p>Equality is also binary&#8211;either you are equal or you are not.  You cannot get around the fact that the vast majority of gay people frame this issue in these terms.  And I&#8217;m quite certain that no amount of meetings will alter that framework.  This is a winner-take-all choice.  There are reasonable people on both sides of this issue.  But some of those reasonable people will not get their way, no matter how reasonable they try to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=71#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Heroes are important. Education is key. Marriage is a basic civil right that should be attainable by all Americans if they choose. For those who are uncomfortable with gay marriage check out our short produced to educate &amp; defuse the controversy. It has a way of opening closed minds &amp; provides some sanity on the issue: www.OUTTAKEonline.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heroes are important. Education is key. Marriage is a basic civil right that should be attainable by all Americans if they choose. For those who are uncomfortable with gay marriage check out our short produced to educate &amp; defuse the controversy. It has a way of opening closed minds &amp; provides some sanity on the issue: <a href="http://www.OUTTAKEonline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.OUTTAKEonline.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/2008/06/26/my-gay-marriage-heroes/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaysdefendmarriage.com/?p=71#comment-861</guid>
		<description>David,
common tactic to find others for support when you are being so mean to others. . .
again, you continue your rants, and as you admittedat your blog made a lesbian cry and she (a friend) won&#039;t talk to you. . .you continue to cross the line of civility, being mean, dismissive and demeaning.  Your &#039;GaysDefendMarriage&#039; should not be relfective of a Plural group.  If you wanted to enter in productive discourse to look at cooperative, collective work supporting GLBT folk, you should have started off without your divisive, arrogant tone.
Based on the writings of others you shift away from any true criticism.  

Blessed are the peace makers. . .for such a devout Jew, again you are not making friends, playing nice, and your disrepectful attitude is truly awful. 

you make think you are winning on the playground, but it won&#039;t be long before you are just playing by yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
common tactic to find others for support when you are being so mean to others. . .<br />
again, you continue your rants, and as you admittedat your blog made a lesbian cry and she (a friend) won&#8217;t talk to you. . .you continue to cross the line of civility, being mean, dismissive and demeaning.  Your &#8216;GaysDefendMarriage&#8217; should not be relfective of a Plural group.  If you wanted to enter in productive discourse to look at cooperative, collective work supporting GLBT folk, you should have started off without your divisive, arrogant tone.<br />
Based on the writings of others you shift away from any true criticism.  </p>
<p>Blessed are the peace makers. . .for such a devout Jew, again you are not making friends, playing nice, and your disrepectful attitude is truly awful. </p>
<p>you make think you are winning on the playground, but it won&#8217;t be long before you are just playing by yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

